Ipswich MP's bypass petition handed in – but will it change anything?
Ipswich MP Jack Abbott says his 4,000-signature petition proves patience has run out over the Orwell Bridge. Council leader Michael Hadwen says he is "fully supportive" of finding a solution, but his response gives no sign that Suffolk County Council's position has shifted.
Why it matters: Every time the Orwell Bridge closes, an estimated 60,000 vehicles a day are forced onto alternative routes, grinding parts of Ipswich to a halt. Research from the Suffolk Chamber of Commerce estimates each closure costs the local economy more than £1 million a day, and the bridge is already operating at around 85% of capacity.
The details: Abbott delivered the petition, signed by 4,069 residents, to Cllr Hadwen at Endeavour House on Friday, 3 July. It calls on the Reform UK-led council to make an Ipswich Northern Bypass a strategic priority, develop a deliverable route and submit a Strategic Outline Business Case to Government.
What they're saying: Abbott said the petition showed "people across Ipswich and Suffolk have had enough of years of delay."
"Every time the Orwell Bridge closes, our town and the surrounding area grinds to a halt," he said. "But this is about much more than traffic congestion. It is about the long-term future of our local economy. The Port of Felixstowe is one of our greatest economic assets, yet it continues to be served by infrastructure that simply is not fit for the demands of the twenty-first century."
He added that the Government had "made clear that if Suffolk County Council develops robust plans and submits a Strategic Outline Business Case, it will engage with the project," and pledged to "work constructively" with the council if it produces proposals.
Responding, Hadwen described a "very constructive meeting" with Abbott after the petition was handed in.
"He's aware that I have already instructed council officers to look at a wide range of potential options and will be reporting back in the next few months," Hadwen said. "Jack is very welcome to join me in using that information to lobby the government for funding and support with the necessary feasibility studies. His petition will be considered in line with our constitution, and I thank him for it."
The other side: Hadwen's reference to a "wide range of potential options" reflects a position the Reform UK administration set out in May, when it replaced a Labour motion committing to a northern bypass, route protection and a business case deadline with a broader instruction to consider all options – including a tunnel and an as-yet-undefined estuary route. At the time, Abbott said the amendment had made delivery of the bypass "impossible," while Labour group leader Councillor Martin Cook accused Reform UK of bringing back "fantasy tunnel schemes."
Labour has pointed to the council's own 2020 study of 32 options for tackling Ipswich's transport problems, in which the top five were all variants of a northern route. A tunnel under the Orwell, estimated to cost around three times as much as a bypass, ranked second-to-last.
For context: A council cabinet report setting out the full range of options, costs and implications is due in September – the same report discussed at a Suffolk Chamber of Commerce transport summit in June, at which Copdock Interchange's inclusion in a national roads investment pipeline was described as the most concrete outcome. Suffolk Chamber has consistently declined to back a single solution, with head of public affairs Paul Simon warning that the "binary debate between bypass and no bypass" was unhelpful.
Oliver Rouane-Williams
The bottom line: Abbott's petition provides a fresh show of support, but Hadwen's response was always going to stop short of endorsing a bypass specifically, restating the council's existing commitment to weighing "a wide range" of options. The September cabinet report remains the point at which Suffolk County Council is expected to show its hand.
Don't forget: If you enjoy our content, please add Ipswich.co.uk as a "preferred source" on Google so you can easily find more of the content you value.
This article cost us ~£54 to produce
It's free for you to read thanks to the generous support of our partners. Please support us by supporting them.
Below the line