All roads lead to one Suffolk council...unless its leader finds another

Less than two months after ministers withdrew their decision to reorganise local government in Suffolk, the county is back in the queue. Minister for Local Government, Devolution and Regional Growth Jim McMahon told the Commons today that the programme is continuing, that the government is minded to proceed in five areas, and that 15 more, Suffolk among them, will have a decision by March next year.

Not whether, but how

The government's position is unambiguous on one point. Reorganisation has not been cancelled anywhere. Withdrawing the decisions taken in July, McMahon said, is not a reflection on the work underpinning those proposals, and all options remain under consideration.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government was blunter still in its statement, quoting the minister: "No areas want to see a return to two-tiers once strong unitary councils are in place."

The first phase of the review also tested the framework underpinning the programme, including whether the criteria set out in February last year still stood. McMahon told the Commons he had concluded that the programme was robust and that the existing criteria were correct on their own terms.

That finding matters in Suffolk more than most. The county council's judicial review turned on the criteria, and Cllr Michael Hadwen told Ipswich.co.uk he regards the minister's conclusion as effectively ending that case. He said he believed McMahon had listened to Suffolk, and that he has no appetite to return to court, describing a second legal challenge as being in neither the administration's nor the public's interest, while making clear he would not rule it out if the county were pushed towards an outcome it could not accept.

In September, after the government withdrew its decision without contesting the judicial review, Cllr Hadwen told this publication there was very little chance of reorganisation returning to the table before the next general election, and that he expected Suffolk to enter 2029 as a two-tier county. Today's statement appears to set a different course: a decision within months, shadow elections in May 2028 and new councils established for 2029.

Two business cases, or more?

McMahon said the government would continue to assess the business cases submitted before the review was launched. In Suffolk, that means two documents.

The first proposes three unitary authorities: Western Suffolk, Central and Eastern Suffolk, and Ipswich and South Suffolk. The second proposes a single unitary covering the whole county. Ministers previously chose the three-unitary option, despite officials having recommended a single authority as the stronger proposition against the government's own criteria.

Crucially, the minister would not be drawn on a repeat. He said he would keep an "open mind" and stressed it "should not be assumed that the same proposal will be automatically selected".

Cllr Hadwen's public statement stopped short of backing either business case.

"I am keeping our options open regarding whether LGR is a good thing for Suffolk and, if so, what deal is the right one," he said. "We will work through plans and continue to engage with all stakeholders and the Government."

Speaking to Ipswich.co.uk, he went slightly further, accepting that a single unitary is the logical option of the two already on the table, while stressing that he wants to review the One Suffolk business case in full before committing to a position, and that he intends to work with the district and borough councils to reach a shared view on what is best for the county.

He also told this publication that the government has not said it is restricted to the proposals already submitted, and that he intends to explore alternatives.

He made it clear that the three-unitary model will not be the Suffolk he signs up to, and that he does not intend to be strong-armed into accepting it.

Cllr Hadwen's objection to the three-unitary model was never solely about the number of councils. He has been explicit that he opposed Felixstowe and Ipswich being placed together in the same authority. A One Suffolk model removes that problem entirely, while allowing the administration to maintain that it defeated the three-unitary plan it took to court.

The opposition view

The Conservative group has been the most consistent voice for a single authority, and used today's announcement to press it again.

"We have always supported the One Suffolk proposal we put forward when Local Government Reorganisation was first introduced in Suffolk," said group leader Cllr Richard Rout. "Of the two options in front of the Government, a single unitary authority offers the best opportunity to bring our county together and give Suffolk a clear direction for the future."

He was careful not to present the county council as the finished article. "There are many services our district and borough councils deliver incredibly well, and there are things the county council doesn't do well enough," he said. "As we move into the next stage of this process, we need to look at what works across Suffolk and make sure we take the best of that forward."

His criticism of ministers was sharper. "Suffolk has been marched up and down the local government reorganisation hill too many times, at vast expense to local taxpayers. This is a shambles of the Government's making."

Cllr Matthew Hicks, the group's spokesperson for LGR, devolution, farming and rural affairs, warned against starting again. "Suffolk has done its homework," he said. "We cannot simply throw all that work away and start from zero."

Cllr Andrew Stringer, who leads the county's Greens – the official opposition at Suffolk County Council, said the government was "basically resetting the clock", and worried that completed work would be wasted. "The delay itself has put a stop to a lot of the momentum and work that had been carried out," he said. He also cautioned that repeated changes to election dates risk confusing residents and depressing turnout.

Labour's group leader at the county council, Cllr Martin Cook, believes it is a straight shootout between one and three unitaries, saying, "Reform needs to say which plan they back."

Cllr Cook also pointed to the administration's own position a year ago. "In September Reform called the withdrawal a 'resounding victory'. The Government has now made clear reorganisation hasn't been cancelled, and the choice is how Suffolk's new councils are drawn, not whether," he said. "A year ago Reform told the County Council the two-tier system had failed. Now they want to keep it."

What happens, and when you vote

The timetable now runs to three separate sets of ballots.

Local elections go ahead in May 2027 on existing council boundaries, which means Suffolk's districts and boroughs are elected for a term that will be curtailed.

Elections to shadow councils follow in May 2028, with the new authorities taking over in 2029. A decision on Suffolk is expected by early next year and will trigger a representations period of at least three weeks.

Running alongside it is devolution. A mayoral election for a Norfolk and Suffolk strategic authority has been pencilled in for 2028. Suffolk County Council's cabinet deferred its decision on whether to consent from 15 October to 12 November, citing what Cllr Hadwen called "strong rumours that ministers are considering changing the date of the mayoral elections once again".

Those rumours have not gone away, and neither has the possibility of a general election arriving sooner than expected. There is also the possibility that Suffolk opts not to consent to devolution next month, despite Norfolk keen to get a deal over the line.

The money is more certain, if less generous than Suffolk was led to expect. The county will receive just over £1.3m towards reorganisation work already done, drawn from a £63m national capacity fund at £450,000 for each previously announced unitary. That is half of the transition funding previously due, with the balance payable once a final decision is taken. In September, Cllr Hadwen said the government would repay Suffolk's six councils for all work undertaken on reorganisation to date.

The bottom line

The argument in Suffolk is no longer about whether the county keeps its two-tier system, because ministers appear to have made plain it will not. It is about what replaces it, and Cllr Hadwen is working to widen that question rather than answer it, arguing that the field is broader than the two business cases already submitted.

Whether ministers agree is the thing to watch over the coming weeks. If the choice does come down to the proposals already in front of them, the logical assumption, for all the aforementioned reasons, is one.

Don't forget: If you enjoy our content, please add Ipswich.co.uk as a "preferred source" on Google so you can easily find more of the content you value.

This article cost us ~£135 to produce

It's free for you to read thanks to the generous support of our partners. Please support us by supporting them.