Suffolk Chamber's A14 report reveals damning impact on Suffolk businesses as MPs speak out on proposed solutions

Why it matters: The stark warning comes from the Suffolk Chamber of Commerce's latest report, Broken Down, that reveals 87% of local firms have been negatively impacted by A14 disruptions in the past 12 months, with many considering scaling back their Suffolk operations.

Oliver Rouane-WilliamsIpswich.co.uk

By the numbers: The Chamber surveyed more than 350 businesses across multiple sectors in November 2024:

• 51% cited increased costs from disruption

• 49% reported negative impacts on client retention

• 32% mentioned staff issues, including childcare costs and retention problems

• 85% said their investment plans will be impacted without improvements

For context: Businesses stated that the Orwell Bridge area causes the most significant disruption (81%), followed by knock-on delays of the Orwell Bridge (46%) and the Copdock Interchange (39%).

The Chamber's view: "Broken Down makes sobering reading. With no end in sight to the regular delays and closures across parts of this nationally vital road, many business owners and employers clearly feel abandoned by Government and National Highways," Suffolk Chamber's chief executive John Dugmore said.

Speaking at the report's launch, the Chamber stated it was "open to all concepts at this stage," including an Ipswich Northern Bypass, but stopped some way short of definitively backing it.

What's next: The Chamber's report outlines several crucial actions:

Immediately:

• Funding for Ely and Haughley rail junction upgrades

• Research into economic costs of A14 delays

• Automated messaging service for closure alerts

Within 12 months:

• National Highways traffic officers at major incidents

• Earlier investment in Copdock Interchange

Within 24 months:

• A government taskforce to investigate additional capacity as Orwell Bridge nears end of lifespan

Oliver Rouane-WilliamsIpswich.co.uk

What MPs are saying: Ipswich MP and Mission Champion for the East of England Jack Abbott, who recently wrote to the PM to request that the government prioritise an Ipswich Northern Bypass, was clear in his view that while he was very supportive of all the solutions proposed by the Chamber, only an Ipswich Northern Bypass would suffice in resolving the A14s issues.

When questioned by this publication if he believed it was possible to resolve the challenges highlighted by the report without an Ipswich Northern Bypass, he answered, "No," before labelling the concept of an Orwell Tunnell "bonkers" and an Upper Orwell Crossing "for the birds."

South Suffolk MP James Cartlidge spoke of the need for stakeholders to be open and honest about the costs of a bypass—financial and to our countryside—saying, "The question we're really asking is do we want to urbanise Suffolk?"

Meanwhile, Central Suffolk and North Ipswich MP Patrick Spencer agreed with the principle findings of the report, stating that "we need to think holistically about our transport infrastructure and collectively lobby to upgrade the links that are critical for the future economic health of Ipswich and wider Suffolk" but has publicly spoken out against an Ipswich Northern Bypass and did not attend the briefing.

The bottom line: All local MPs have backed the Chamber's calls for urgent action, but, as is often the case, there is likely to be disagreement amongst key stakeholders on exactly which options represent the best long-term solution, with Ipswich's two MPs already at loggerheads on the Northern Bypass and the Chamber of Commerce remaining "open to all concepts" but falling short of explicitly backing it.

Whatever happens next, to use the words of Ipswich MP Jack Abbott: "The cost of failing to act is far too high."