Reform faces cross-party backlash over Suffolk LGR judicial review plan

Why it matters: A judicial review could potentially delay or disrupt Suffolk's transition to a new unitary structure, but opposition leaders argue such a challenge would be costly, legally weak, and politically motivated.

The details: Cllr Richard Rout, Leader of the Suffolk Conservative Group, said the Reform UK group on Suffolk County Council had not yet set out clear legal grounds for the proposed challenge.

"It's well known that we believe the government reached the wrong decision on LGR," Cllr Rout said. "In fact, their proposals contain nonsensical boundaries and will doubtless cost more than the current system. However, not liking a decision is not grounds for judicial review."

He added: "What has been described by Reform thus far sounds like a spurious scatter-gun approach – they don't even seem to know on what grounds they are challenging."

What they're saying: Cllr Rout argued that the legal threshold for a successful judicial review was high and that council officers had previously advised Reform's case would not meet it.

"To succeed, a judicial review needs to show the decision was illegal, irrational, or procedurally flawed. A few short weeks ago, council staff were advising us none of those tests are met here," he said.

"The irrationality bar is ludicrously high and even if a procedural flaw were found, the Secretary of State could simply make the same decision again."

He also questioned the motivation behind the challenge: "A judicial review that costs a fortune, goes nowhere but drags on for months could be seen as a desperate bid to derail next year's unitary elections and cling to power."

The Green view: Cllr Andrew Stringer, the main opposition leader at the county council, said this was a "poor start" for the new administration.

“We think a unitary government gives us the best chance of bringing services together while having accountability,” he added, “we need to be busy delivering this new democratic model.”

Labour reaction: Cllr Neil MacDonald, Leader of Ipswich Borough Council, also criticised the proposed legal action, framing it as a misuse of public money at the expense of Ipswich priorities.

"Unbelievable to see that the first action of Reform at SCC is to waste £100k launching a legal challenge on Local Government Reorganisation, rather than moving forward on an Ipswich bypass or fixing our crumbling roads," he said.

"Clearly, they don't care any more about Ipswich than the previous Tory administration did. Reform are starting off by wasting taxpayers money, despite widespread support for a new council centred on Ipswich."

Reform responds: Mr Hadwen defended the proposed challenge, arguing that the cost of legal action would be outweighed by the cost of LGR itself.

"The LGR decision is one that will break up Suffolk, will cost the taxpayer's more, for likely weakened services and is not popular with the electorate," he said.

"We will be looking at all options available to us, and our reasoning will be set out with our announcement. It is unfortunate that there are those who would rather sit back and watch our great county be destroyed then fight, but Reform in Suffolk won't rest and along with Essex and Norfolk we will hold this terrible decision to account."

He added: "The cost of a JR is nothing compared to the cost of LGR."

Mr Hadwen said he would not be commenting on the specifics of the case until Reform UK had formally set out its position.

Both the One Suffolk and Power of Three proposals for local government reform projected significant savings from the changes.

For context: The Government announced in March that it was proceeding with Local Government Reorganisation in Suffolk, a decision that will see the county's existing two-tier structure replaced with new unitary authorities.

Reform UK is set to take control of Suffolk County Council, with Michael Hadwen due to be formally confirmed as leader at the authority's annual general meeting on Thursday, 21 May 2026.

The bigger picture: Suffolk's Reform group is not the first to threaten legal action over LGR. In Essex, the incoming Reform UK leader of the county council, Peter Harris, wrote to Communities Secretary Steve Reed on Wednesday, 14 May, describing the Government's proposals as "ill-thought, expensive and purely ideological in nature."

• Mr Harris said he had instructed lawyers to prepare a pre-action protocol letter, which he intended to send "subject to my group's approval."
• "We will utilise all resources at our disposal to challenge and resist LGR," he said.
• In March, the Government backed a model of five all-purpose councils in Essex to replace the current structure of 15 councils.

What's next: Ministers will need to pass legislation in Parliament later this year to abolish and replace the existing councils. Michael Hadwen is expected to be confirmed as Leader of Suffolk County Council on Thursday, 21 May, at which point the Reform UK administration is expected to set out the formal basis of its legal challenge.

The bottom line: With Reform UK poised to take formal control of Suffolk County Council next week, opposition leaders have set out an early line of attack on what it sees as a legally weak and politically motivated challenge to LGR – a position that mirrors the cost concerns being raised in Essex as that authority's own legal challenge takes shape.

Don't forget: If you enjoy our content, please add Ipswich.co.uk as a "preferred source" on Google so you can easily find more of the content you value.

This article cost us ~£57 to produce

It's free for you to read thanks to the generous support of our partners. Please support us by supporting them.